Loading page content, please wait.
Lovisa Holdings Limited
Consumer Cyclical · Specialty Retail
Updated just now
$21.00
MARKET CAP
$2.33B
P/E RATIO
26.9
DIV. YIELD
3.7%
FRANKING
38%
Lovisa Holdings Limited engages in the retail sale of fashion jewelry and accessories. The company designs, develops, sources, and merchandises fashion jewelry, body and piercings, accessories, and gifts products under the Lovisa brand name.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
$11.06
For 6% dividend yield
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
Exceptional 87.3% ROE places this among elite companies. Strong competitive advantage evident.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
87.3%
Threshold
15.0%
Worst Year
29.7%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 87.3%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.87 in annual profit. The threshold is 15%, and the worst single year was 29.7%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
At 87.3% ROE, every $1 retained by this company generates $0.87 in annual profit. This exceptional compounding power is what drives long-term wealth - and for dividend investors, it often translates to sustainable dividend growth without needing to borrow or dilute shareholders.
Sources
Profit after production costs, before overhead
Real cash left after running the business
Positive cash generation. Company produces real cash after capital expenditures - can fund dividends, buybacks, or growth.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$149M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Positive
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $149M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Positive FCF means dividends are funded by real cash generation.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Positive cash flow means dividends are funded by actual money, not accounting profits. As Buffett says, "Cash is fact, profit is opinion." Your income is backed by real cash generation.
Sources
How much the company owes vs. what it owns
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Price versus estimated intrinsic value and required return thresholds.
What percentage of the stock price comes back as earnings each year
How efficiently the company turns money into profit
Is the business growing — and is debt being managed responsibly?
Revenue and debt both growing — check whether debt is funding productive growth or covering shortfalls. Sustainable dividends require revenue to outpace debt over time.
Current Snapshot
Revenue Change
+142.6%
Debt Change
+78.9%
Trend State
Mixed
Why It Matters
Revenue trend shows whether the business is expanding or contracting. Debt trend adds context on whether growth is being funded conservatively.
Formula
Revenue Change (%) = (Latest Revenue - Earliest Revenue) / |Earliest Revenue| x 100; Debt Change (%) = (Latest Debt - Earliest Debt) / |Earliest Debt| x 100Method
Map annual revenue history and, where relevant, annual debt history. For financial companies, debt is excluded because deposits and reserves distort this signal.
Worked Example
Revenue changed by +142.6% across the displayed period, while debt changed by +78.9%.
How to Interpret
Rising revenue with stable or falling debt is typically stronger than rising revenue funded by rapidly rising leverage.
Revenue and debt both growing — check whether debt is funding productive growth or covering shortfalls. Sustainable dividends require revenue to outpace debt over time.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
3.16% yield is well below the 6% target. Not suitable for Barsi's income strategy.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
3.2%
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
3.7%
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
With a 6-year average annual dividend of $0.66 and a share price of $21.00, the Barsi yield is 3.2%. The minimum requirement is 6%. Including franking credits, the gross yield is 3.7%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Low yield means you need significant capital to generate meaningful income. Barsi's strategy focuses on stocks that provide substantial cash flow from day one.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~2 Sept 2026Est | ~13 Oct 2026 | ~$0.36 | 50% | ~$0.30 | $0.06 |
| ~2 Mar 2027Est | ~30 Mar 2027 | ~$0.44 | 50% | ~$0.36 | $0.08 |
Highest price to lock in 6% yield
Industry category of the business
Consumer Cyclical is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Specialty Retail
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
Sources
How much of a company's earnings are paid out as dividends
A 97% payout means the company distributes most of its earnings as dividends — more income per share now, but less room for growth. Around 67% is often considered “normal” for established companies. This level feeds directly into the price ceiling calculation.
Current Snapshot
Latest Ratio
97.2%
Healthy Range
30%-75%
Zone
Elevated
Why It Matters
Payout ratio links dividends to earnings capacity and helps evaluate whether current distributions are likely to remain supportable.
Formula
Payout Ratio (%) = (Annual Dividend per Share / Earnings per Share) x 100Method
Calculate year-by-year payout ratios where EPS is positive, classify each year by sustainability zone, and compare with the current TTM ratio.
Worked Example
$0.77 dividend / $0.78 EPS equals 98.6% payout ratio.
How to Interpret
Ratios in the middle range are usually more sustainable than very high ratios. Values above 100% indicate dividends exceeded earnings in that period.
A 97% payout means the company distributes most of its earnings as dividends — more income per share now, but less room for growth. Around 67% is often considered “normal” for established companies. This level feeds directly into the price ceiling calculation.
Sources
Lovisa Holdings Limited engages in the retail sale of fashion jewelry and accessories. The company designs, develops, sources, and merchandises fashion jewelry, body and piercings, accessories, and gifts products under the Lovisa brand name. It also retails its products online. It operated its retail and franchise stores in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Vietnam, China, South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Luxembourg, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Poland, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Ireland, Zambia, South America, and the Middle East.
Lovisa Holdings Limited was founded in 2010 and is based in Hawthorn, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
When leaders own 20%+, they win when you win and lose when you lose
A handful of professional investors are watching
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
The people running this company own a large chunk of it (42.9%). When leadership has their own money on the line, they tend to make decisions that benefit all shareholders — not just their salary. Professional fund managers also hold shares, which is a vote of confidence in the business.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
42.9%
Institutional %
17.8%
Float %
39.3%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 42.9% and institutions own 17.8%, public float is 39.3%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
The people running this company own a large chunk of it (42.9%). When leadership has their own money on the line, they tend to make decisions that benefit all shareholders — not just their salary. Professional fund managers also hold shares, which is a vote of confidence in the business.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Mar 2026 | Blundy (Brett) Non Executive Chairman | Purchase at price 14.27 per share. | 263K | $3.8M |
| 20 Mar 2026 | Carter (Bruce James) Independent Non-Executive Director | Purchase at price 14.89 per share. | 20K | $298K |
| 20 Mar 2026 | Carter (Bruce James) Independent Non-Executive Director | Purchase at price 14.76 per share. | 20K | $295K |
| 19 Mar 2026 | Blundy (Brett) Non Executive Chairman | Purchase at price 0.00 per share. | 97K | $9 |
| 17 Mar 2026 | Blundy (Brett) Non Executive Chairman | Purchase at price 0.01 per share. | 2K | $14 |
Company insiders have been net buyers of shares over the past 12 months. This may indicate management confidence in future prospects.
Value analysis may be affected by missing data.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
Exceptional 79.1% margins indicate strong pricing power and brand value.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
79.1%
Threshold
40%
Worst Year
76.7%
Why It Matters
Gross margin indicates how much room a business has to absorb costs and still generate profit.
Formula
(Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue x 100Method
Assess both the long-term average and the weakest year. The framework checks for both level and consistency.
Worked Example
This company's 4-year average gross margin is 79.1% — it keeps 79 cents of every revenue dollar after production costs. The threshold is 40%, and the weakest year was 76.7%.
How to Interpret
Sustained high margins usually support durability. Sharp margin swings can signal weaker control or cyclical pressure.
Exceptional margins mean the company has strong pricing power - customers pay premium prices even when cheaper alternatives exist. This buffer protects profits (and dividends) even if costs rise.
Sources
Debt-to-equity of 4.47 is 3.0x over Buffett's limit. High leverage increases risk during downturns.
Current Snapshot
Current D/E
4.47x
Industry Limit
1.50x
Headroom
-2.97x
Why It Matters
Debt-to-equity shows balance-sheet risk. Lower leverage usually means more flexibility when earnings soften.
Formula
Total Debt / Shareholders' EquityMethod
Compare current D/E against the industry threshold used in the scoring framework, then assess remaining headroom.
Worked Example
This company's D/E is 4.47, meaning it carries 447 cents of debt for every $1 of equity. The consumer cyclical & retail limit is 1.50, leaving it 2.97 over the limit.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally imply lower refinancing pressure and lower dividend stress in downturns.
High debt means interest payments come before dividends. During recessions, heavily indebted companies often cut dividends first to preserve cash. This adds risk to your income stream.
Sources
Current ratio of 0.93 is below 1.0 - company may struggle to pay short-term obligations.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
0.93x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 0.93x — it has $0.93 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Tight liquidity means the company may need to borrow or sell assets to pay bills. Dividends are often the first expense cut when cash runs low.
Sources
3.7% earnings yield is below the 7.5% threshold. You'd earn nearly as much from safer government bonds, which means the extra risk of owning shares isn't being compensated.
Current Snapshot
Current Yield
3.7%
Required Yield
7.5%
Spread
-3.8pp
Why It Matters
Earnings yield reframes valuation as return on price paid. It helps compare equity earnings power against lower-risk alternatives.
Formula
(Earnings per Share / Stock Price) x 100Method
Calculate current earnings yield, then compare it to the required yield for the stock's industry setting.
Worked Example
With EPS of $0.78 and a share price of $21.00, earnings yield is 3.7%. The required yield for this industry is 7.5% (based on 4.5% government bond rate plus a risk premium).
How to Interpret
A yield above the required level suggests better valuation support; below it indicates thinner compensation for equity risk.
Returns don't justify the added risk compared to safe bonds. Consider whether the dividend yield alone compensates, or wait for a better price.
Sources
Exceptional 21.8% ROIC indicates a strong competitive advantage and efficient use of capital.
Current Snapshot
5Y Avg
21.8%
Threshold
10.5%
WACC Delta
+13.3pp
Why It Matters
ROIC measures capital efficiency. Businesses that repeatedly earn above their funding cost can compound value more effectively.
Formula
After-Tax Operating Profit / Invested Capital x 100Method
Use the 5-year average ROIC and compare it with industry WACC plus the required spread in this framework.
Worked Example
This company's 5-year average ROIC is 21.8%, with a cost of capital (WACC) of 8.5%. The +13.3pp spread above WACC suggests it creates value on each dollar invested.
How to Interpret
A healthy spread above WACC suggests value creation; a narrow or negative spread points to weaker capital efficiency.
Exceptional returns on capital mean every dollar reinvested creates significant value. This is the engine that can power both capital appreciation and growing dividends.
Sources
Years of earnings needed to retire all long-term debt
Excellent. Could pay off all long-term debt in 0.7 years — minimal debt burden.
Current Snapshot
Payoff Years
0.7yr
Target Years
4yr
Gap
+3.3yr
Why It Matters
Debt payoff years converts leverage into an intuitive time measure, making debt burden easier to compare across stocks.
Formula
Long-Term Debt / Average Net Income (3yr)Method
Use current long-term debt and the 3-year average net income to smooth one-off profit noise.
Worked Example
With $54M in long-term debt and $75M in average annual earnings (3yr), it would take 0.7 years of earnings to pay off all debt. The consumer cyclical & retail threshold is 4 years.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally indicate stronger debt capacity. Very high values can constrain dividend resilience.
Very low debt means maximum financial flexibility. Interest costs barely dent profits, leaving more for dividends. This company can weather downturns without touching your income.
Sources
Consistency of profits over time
10/4 positive EPS years. Limited data - full evaluation requires 8+ years. Monitor closely for consistency.
Current Snapshot
Positive Years
10/4
Allowed Losses
0 (limited)
EPS CAGR
19.5%
Why It Matters
Consistency in EPS helps distinguish resilient earnings power from one-off performance spikes.
Formula
Positive EPS Years / Available EPS YearsMethod
For 8+ years of data, apply industry-specific loss tolerance. For limited data, every available year must be positive.
Worked Example
This company reported positive earnings in 10 of the last 4 years. With only 4 years of data, every year must be positive. EPS growth rate (CAGR) is 19.5%.
How to Interpret
Fewer loss years and stronger EPS continuity generally improve confidence in future dividend and valuation assumptions.
So far so good, but limited history means we haven't seen how this company handles a full economic cycle. Monitor closely for continued consistency.
Sources
How much earnings are consumed by capital expenditure
CapEx consumes 72% of cumulative earnings — above the 50% threshold. This business requires heavy reinvestment just to maintain operations.
Current Snapshot
10Y CapEx Intensity
72%
Threshold
50%
Buffer
-22%
Why It Matters
CapEx intensity estimates how much of earnings must be reinvested just to sustain operations.
Formula
Cumulative CapEx (10yr) / Cumulative Net Income (10yr) x 100Method
Aggregate 10-year CapEx and net income, then compare the ratio with the sector threshold in the framework.
Worked Example
Over 10 years, 72% of this company's cumulative earnings were consumed by capital expenditure. The consumer cyclical & retail threshold is 50%, leaving a buffer of -22% (over threshold).
How to Interpret
Lower ratios usually indicate better cash conversion. Higher ratios can reduce room for dividends and buybacks.
High capital intensity means most earnings go back into equipment and infrastructure rather than dividends or growth. Buffett prefers businesses like See's Candies that generate cash without needing much reinvestment.
Sources
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Mar 2026Interim | 26 Mar 2026 | $0.64 | 50% | $0.53 | $0.11 |
| 15 Sept 2025Final | 13 Oct 2025 | $0.27 | 0% | $0.27 | $0.00 |
| 6 Mar 2025Interim | 3 Apr 2025 | $0.50 | 0% | $0.50 | $0.00 |
| 13 Sept 2024Final | 11 Oct 2024 | $0.37 | 0% | $0.37 | $0.00 |
| 5 Mar 2024Interim | 2 Apr 2024 | $0.50 | 0% | $0.50 | $0.00 |
| 12 Sept 2023Final | 10 Oct 2023 | $0.31 | 0% | $0.31 | $0.00 |
| 7 Mar 2023Interim | 4 Apr 2023 | $0.38 | 0% | $0.38 | $0.00 |
| 14 Sept 2022Final | 12 Oct 2022 | $0.37 | 0% | $0.37 | $0.00 |
| 8 Mar 2022Interim | 5 Apr 2022 | $0.37 | 0% | $0.37 | $0.00 |
| 15 Sept 2021Final | 13 Oct 2021 | $0.18 | 0% | $0.18 | $0.00 |
Excellent track record. 11 years of consistent dividends through multiple market cycles.
Current Snapshot
History
11yr
Predictability
Moderate
Payout Health
High risk
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 11 years of dividend history (2016–2026). No suspensions detected — 11 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: Moderate. Payout health: High risk. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
A 11-year track record through multiple economic cycles gives confidence your income will continue. This company has proven it prioritises shareholder returns.
Sources
Current price ($21.00) is 90% above the ceiling. Wait for a drop to lock in 6% yield.
Current Snapshot
Current Price
$21.00
Max Buy Price
$11.06
Delta
-89.9%
Why It Matters
The price ceiling links valuation discipline to income targets by defining the price that aligns with a 6% yield target.
Formula
6-Year Average Annual Dividend / 0.06Method
Use the 6-year average dividend (not one year) and divide by 0.06 to estimate the maximum entry price for target yield.
Worked Example
With a current price of $21.00 and a ceiling of $11.06, the entry is 89.9% above the ceiling.
How to Interpret
Prices below the ceiling imply a historical yield above 6%; prices above it imply a lower historical yield at entry.
At this price, you won't achieve Barsi's target 6% yield. Consider waiting for a pullback — market volatility often creates more favourable valuations for patient investors.
Sources
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Nick Scali Limited
Harvey Norman Holdings Limited
JB Hi-Fi Limited
Joyce Corporation Ltd
ARB Corporation Limited
Scroll to see more