Ventia Services Group Limited
Industrials · Infrastructure Operations
Updated 18 hours ago
$5.22
MARKET CAP
$4.30B
P/E RATIO
16.3
DIV. YIELD
4.4%
FRANKING
84%
Ventia Services Group Limited provides infrastructure services in Australia and New Zealand. It offers asset management services, such as asset condition analysis, strategy and planning, risk optimization, and systems and documentation; and digital solutions, including panorama property portal, drone solutions, remote electronic verification systems, automatic meter readings, Ventia operations centre, and telecommunication system integration services.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
$12.79
Discounted cash flow estimate
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
Exceptional 31.7% ROE places this among elite companies. Strong competitive advantage evident.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
31.7%
Threshold
6.0%
Worst Year
5.0%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 31.7%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.32 in annual profit. The threshold is 6%, and the worst single year was 5.0%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
At 31.7% ROE, every $1 retained by this company generates $0.32 in annual profit. This exceptional compounding power is what drives long-term wealth - and for dividend investors, it often translates to sustainable dividend growth without needing to borrow or dilute shareholders.
Sources
Real cash left after running the business
Positive cash generation. Company produces real cash after capital expenditures - can fund dividends, buybacks, or growth.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$269M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Positive
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $269M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Positive FCF means dividends are funded by real cash generation.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Positive cash flow means dividends are funded by actual money, not accounting profits. As Buffett says, "Cash is fact, profit is opinion." Your income is backed by real cash generation.
Sources
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Price versus estimated intrinsic value and required return thresholds.
How current price compares with estimated intrinsic value
How much earnings are consumed by capital expenditure
Is the business growing — and is debt being managed responsibly?
Revenue growing while debt is declining — dividends are likely funded by business performance, not borrowing. This is the strongest signal of dividend sustainability.
Current Snapshot
Revenue Change
+34.8%
Debt Change
-42.6%
Trend State
Improving
Why It Matters
Revenue trend shows whether the business is expanding or contracting. Debt trend adds context on whether growth is being funded conservatively.
Formula
Revenue Change (%) = (Latest Revenue - Earliest Revenue) / |Earliest Revenue| x 100; Debt Change (%) = (Latest Debt - Earliest Debt) / |Earliest Debt| x 100Method
Map annual revenue history and, where relevant, annual debt history. For financial companies, debt is excluded because deposits and reserves distort this signal.
Worked Example
Revenue changed by +34.8% across the displayed period, while debt changed by -42.6%.
How to Interpret
Rising revenue with stable or falling debt is typically stronger than rising revenue funded by rapidly rising leverage.
Revenue growing while debt is declining — dividends are likely funded by business performance, not borrowing. This is the strongest signal of dividend sustainability.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
Ventia Services Group Limited provides infrastructure services in Australia and New Zealand. It offers asset management services, such as asset condition analysis, strategy and planning, risk optimization, and systems and documentation; and digital solutions, including panorama property portal, drone solutions, remote electronic verification systems, automatic meter readings, Ventia operations centre, and telecommunication system integration services. The company also provides engineering services comprising motorway, tunnel and road network, advanced engineering; transmission and distribution; multi-disciplinary engineering; minor capital; asset performance; design and drafting; and project services. In addition, the company offers environmental services and energy consisting of sewer, water, air, surface water, petroleum, and waste monitoring services; environmental and land management, community engagement, remediation, PFAS remediation, flood warning systems, and bushfire management systems and plans; and facilities management services, such as integrated, soft, and hard facility management, and clothing services.
Further, the company provides network design and building services, such as telecommunications network design and building, site acquisition, and telecommunication system integration; operations and maintenance services, including fleet management, operations control room management, energy, resources, and industrial services, network operations and maintenance; incident response and recovery; high voltage technical services; property and consulting services; and minor capital works consisting of design, documentation, commissioning, and construction of new assets, as well as renewal and refurbishment of existing assets. Ventia Services Group Limited was founded in 1956 and is headquartered in North Sydney, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Management's wealth moves with yours
Large fund blocks can amplify price swings unrelated to business quality
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Insiders hold a meaningful 10.0%, showing management confidence. But institutions dominate at 63.2% — this means fund managers collectively control most voting power. Large institutional blocks can cause price swings during quarterly rebalancing that have nothing to do with company performance.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
10.0%
Institutional %
63.2%
Float %
26.8%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 10.0% and institutions own 63.2%, public float is 26.8%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Insiders hold a meaningful 10.0%, showing management confidence. But institutions dominate at 63.2% — this means fund managers collectively control most voting power. Large institutional blocks can cause price swings during quarterly rebalancing that have nothing to do with company performance.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Mar 2026 | Banks (Dean J) Chief Executive Officer | Unknown | 6.5M | — |
Company insiders have been net buyers of shares over the past 12 months. This may indicate management confidence in future prospects.
Dividend analysis may be affected by missing data.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
Current ratio of 0.97 is below 1.0 - company may struggle to pay short-term obligations.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
0.97x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 0.97x — it has $0.97 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Tight liquidity means the company may need to borrow or sell assets to pay bills. Dividends are often the first expense cut when cash runs low.
Sources
Stock is trading 42% BELOW the fair-value threshold (includes 30% margin of safety).
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
59.2%
Industry Threshold
30%
Status
42% Undervalued
Why It Matters
Margin of safety provides a valuation buffer against modelling uncertainty and adverse business outcomes.
Formula
(Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share - Current Price) / Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share x 100Method
Estimate intrinsic value using a two-stage DCF (10-year projection plus terminal value), then compare with current price.
Worked Example
For this stock now: intrinsic value is $12.79 per share, current price is $5.22, and margin of safety is 59.2%.
How to Interpret
Positive margin indicates price below modelled value; negative margin indicates price above modelled value. Compare against the industry's required buffer.
Price is below your required threshold, so you retain a margin-of-safety buffer against normal valuation error and market volatility.
Sources
What percentage of the stock price comes back as earnings each year
6.1% earnings yield is below the 7.5% threshold. You'd earn nearly as much from safer government bonds, which means the extra risk of owning shares isn't being compensated.
Current Snapshot
Current Yield
6.1%
Required Yield
7.5%
Spread
-1.4pp
Why It Matters
Earnings yield reframes valuation as return on price paid. It helps compare equity earnings power against lower-risk alternatives.
Formula
(Earnings per Share / Stock Price) x 100Method
Calculate current earnings yield, then compare it to the required yield for the stock's industry setting.
Worked Example
With EPS of $0.32 and a share price of $5.22, earnings yield is 6.1%. The required yield for this industry is 7.5% (based on 4.5% government bond rate plus a risk premium).
How to Interpret
A yield above the required level suggests better valuation support; below it indicates thinner compensation for equity risk.
Returns don't justify the added risk compared to safe bonds. Consider whether the dividend yield alone compensates, or wait for a better price.
Sources
Moderate capital intensity. 31% of earnings goes to CapEx — within the 100% threshold for this sector.
Current Snapshot
10Y CapEx Intensity
31%
Threshold
100%
Buffer
+69%
Why It Matters
CapEx intensity estimates how much of earnings must be reinvested just to sustain operations.
Formula
Cumulative CapEx (10yr) / Cumulative Net Income (10yr) x 100Method
Aggregate 10-year CapEx and net income, then compare the ratio with the sector threshold in the framework.
Worked Example
Over 10 years, 31% of this company's cumulative earnings were consumed by capital expenditure. The infrastructure & transport threshold is 100%, leaving a buffer of +69%.
How to Interpret
Lower ratios usually indicate better cash conversion. Higher ratios can reduce room for dividends and buybacks.
Capital needs are manageable for this sector. The business retains enough earnings to fund both maintenance and shareholder returns.
Sources
Consistency of profits over time
5/5 positive EPS years. Limited data - full evaluation requires 8+ years. Monitor closely for consistency.
Current Snapshot
Positive Years
5/5
Allowed Losses
0 (limited)
EPS CAGR
79.0%
Why It Matters
Consistency in EPS helps distinguish resilient earnings power from one-off performance spikes.
Formula
Positive EPS Years / Available EPS YearsMethod
For 8+ years of data, apply industry-specific loss tolerance. For limited data, every available year must be positive.
Worked Example
This company reported positive earnings in 5 of the last 5 years. With only 5 years of data, every year must be positive. EPS growth rate (CAGR) is 79.0%.
How to Interpret
Fewer loss years and stronger EPS continuity generally improve confidence in future dividend and valuation assumptions.
So far so good, but limited history means we haven't seen how this company handles a full economic cycle. Monitor closely for continued consistency.
Sources
Percentage of revenue that becomes profit after all expenses
4.4% net margin is below the 15% threshold. May reflect this sector's structural characteristics.
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
4.4%
Threshold
15.0%
Relative Position
-10.6%
Why It Matters
Net income margin shows how much profit the business keeps from each dollar of revenue after all costs.
Formula
Net Income / Total Revenue x 100Method
Compare current margin with the industry-specific threshold to avoid cross-sector distortions.
Worked Example
This company's net income margin is 4.4% — it keeps 4 cents of every revenue dollar as profit after all expenses. The infrastructure & transport threshold is 15%, putting it 10.6% below the requirement.
How to Interpret
Margins that are both strong and stable can indicate competitive strength; persistent weakness may limit reinvestment and payout capacity.
Lower margins in this sector are common, but they leave less cushion if costs rise or revenue drops. Monitor whether margins are stable over time — consistency matters more than the absolute level.
Sources
Insufficient dividend history. Barsi methodology requires 6 years of data to calculate average yield.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
N/A
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
N/A
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
If annual dividends are $0.60 and the share price is $10, dividend yield is 6.0%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Without 6 years of dividend history, we can't assess whether the yield is sustainable or a one-time spike. More data is needed to evaluate income potential.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Feb 2026Interim | 9 Apr 2026 | $0.17 | 90% | $0.13 | $0.05 |
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2025Final | 8 Oct 2025 | $0.15 | 90% | $0.11 | $0.04 |
| 27 Feb 2025Interim | 3 Apr 2025 | $0.14 | 80% | $0.11 | $0.04 |
| 29 Aug 2024Final | 3 Oct 2024 | $0.13 | 80% | $0.09 | $0.03 |
| 29 Feb 2024Interim | 4 Apr 2024 | $0.13 | 80% | $0.09 | $0.03 |
| 30 Aug 2023Final | 4 Oct 2023 | $0.11 | 80% | $0.08 | $0.03 |
| 1 Mar 2023Interim | 5 Apr 2023 | $0.11 | 80% | $0.08 | $0.03 |
| 30 Aug 2022Final | 4 Oct 2022 | $0.10 | 80% | $0.07 | $0.03 |
| 28 Feb 2022Interim | 4 Apr 2022 | $0.02 | 100% | $0.01 | $0.01 |
Only 5 years of dividend history available. Barsi methodology requires 6+ years to evaluate consistency.
Current Snapshot
History
5yr
Predictability
N/A
Payout Health
Elevated
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 5 years of dividend history (2022–2026). No suspensions detected — 5 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: N/A. Payout health: Elevated. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
Without 6 years of history, we can't verify this company maintained dividends through economic cycles. Longer track records provide confidence your income will continue.
Sources
Industry category of the business
Industrials is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Infrastructure Operations
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Infrastructure Operations (Industrials sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Sources
How much of a company's earnings are paid out as dividends
A 67% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Current Snapshot
Latest Ratio
66.7%
Healthy Range
30%-75%
Zone
Healthy
Why It Matters
Payout ratio links dividends to earnings capacity and helps evaluate whether current distributions are likely to remain supportable.
Formula
Payout Ratio (%) = (Annual Dividend per Share / Earnings per Share) x 100Method
Calculate year-by-year payout ratios where EPS is positive, classify each year by sustainability zone, and compare with the current TTM ratio.
Worked Example
$0.21 dividend / $0.32 EPS equals 66.7% payout ratio.
How to Interpret
Ratios in the middle range are usually more sustainable than very high ratios. Values above 100% indicate dividends exceeded earnings in that period.
A 67% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Sources
Atlas Arteria Limited
Reece Limited
NRW Holdings Limited
Cleanaway Waste Management Limited
Monadelphous Group Limited
Scroll to see more