Loading page content, please wait.
Ridley Corporation Limited
Consumer Defensive · Packaged Foods
Updated 18 hours ago
$2.64
MARKET CAP
$989.61M
P/E RATIO
21.9
DIV. YIELD
3.8%
FRANKING
100%
Ridley Corporation Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of animal nutrition solutions in Australia the United States, New Zealand, and Thailand.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
$2.66
Discounted cash flow estimate
$1.15
For 6% dividend yield
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
How much the company owes vs. what it owns
Excellent. Very low debt (0.06) means strong financial flexibility and minimal bankruptcy risk.
Current Snapshot
Current D/E
0.06x
Industry Limit
0.50x
Headroom
+0.44x
Why It Matters
Debt-to-equity shows balance-sheet risk. Lower leverage usually means more flexibility when earnings soften.
Formula
Total Debt / Shareholders' EquityMethod
Compare current D/E against the industry threshold used in the scoring framework, then assess remaining headroom.
Worked Example
This company's D/E is 0.06, meaning it carries 6 cents of debt for every $1 of equity. The consumer staples limit is 0.50, leaving 0.44 of headroom.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally imply lower refinancing pressure and lower dividend stress in downturns.
Very low debt means this company has maximum flexibility. They won't need to cut dividends to service loans during downturns - your income stream is protected by a fortress balance sheet.
Sources
Real cash left after running the business
Positive cash generation. Company produces real cash after capital expenditures - can fund dividends, buybacks, or growth.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$32M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Positive
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $32M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Positive FCF means dividends are funded by real cash generation.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Positive cash flow means dividends are funded by actual money, not accounting profits. As Buffett says, "Cash is fact, profit is opinion." Your income is backed by real cash generation.
Sources
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
Profit after production costs, before overhead
Price versus estimated intrinsic value and required return thresholds.
What percentage of the stock price comes back as earnings each year
Consistency of profits over time
Is the business growing — and is debt being managed responsibly?
Revenue growing while debt is declining — dividends are likely funded by business performance, not borrowing. This is the strongest signal of dividend sustainability.
Current Snapshot
Revenue Change
+42.7%
Debt Change
-79.0%
Trend State
Improving
Why It Matters
Revenue trend shows whether the business is expanding or contracting. Debt trend adds context on whether growth is being funded conservatively.
Formula
Revenue Change (%) = (Latest Revenue - Earliest Revenue) / |Earliest Revenue| x 100; Debt Change (%) = (Latest Debt - Earliest Debt) / |Earliest Debt| x 100Method
Map annual revenue history and, where relevant, annual debt history. For financial companies, debt is excluded because deposits and reserves distort this signal.
Worked Example
Revenue changed by +42.7% across the displayed period, while debt changed by -79.0%.
How to Interpret
Rising revenue with stable or falling debt is typically stronger than rising revenue funded by rapidly rising leverage.
Revenue growing while debt is declining — dividends are likely funded by business performance, not borrowing. This is the strongest signal of dividend sustainability.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
2.60% yield is well below the 6% target. Not suitable for Barsi's income strategy.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
2.6%
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
3.7%
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
With a 6-year average annual dividend of $0.07 and a share price of $2.64, the Barsi yield is 2.6%. The minimum requirement is 6%. Including franking credits, the gross yield is 3.7%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Low yield means you need significant capital to generate meaningful income. Barsi's strategy focuses on stocks that provide substantial cash flow from day one.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Apr 2026Interim | 23 Apr 2026 | $0.07 | 100% | $0.05 | $0.02 |
| ~1 Oct 2026Est | ~23 Oct 2026 | ~$0.06 | 100% | ~$0.04 | $0.02 |
Highest price to lock in 6% yield
Industry category of the business
Consumer Defensive is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Packaged Foods
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
Sources
How much of a company's earnings are paid out as dividends
A 48% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Current Snapshot
Latest Ratio
47.9%
Healthy Range
30%-75%
Zone
Healthy
Why It Matters
Payout ratio links dividends to earnings capacity and helps evaluate whether current distributions are likely to remain supportable.
Formula
Payout Ratio (%) = (Annual Dividend per Share / Earnings per Share) x 100Method
Calculate year-by-year payout ratios where EPS is positive, classify each year by sustainability zone, and compare with the current TTM ratio.
Worked Example
$0.10 dividend / $0.13 EPS equals 74.0% payout ratio.
How to Interpret
Ratios in the middle range are usually more sustainable than very high ratios. Values above 100% indicate dividends exceeded earnings in that period.
A 48% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Sources
Ridley Corporation Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of animal nutrition solutions in Australia the United States, New Zealand, and Thailand. It operates through two segments, Packaged Feeds and Ingredients, and Bulk Stockfeeds. The company provides aqua feeds, bulk ruminant stockfeeds, bulk monogastric stockfeeds, animal proteins and oils, and commodities; and NovaqPro, as well as engages in specialty products distribution. It also engages in the retail of animal feeds.
Ridley Corporation Limited was incorporated in 1987 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Management's wealth moves with yours
A handful of professional investors are watching
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Insiders hold 19.2% and institutions hold 29.5%. Look for higher insider ownership as a sign that leadership believes in the long-term value of the business.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
19.2%
Institutional %
29.5%
Float %
51.4%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 19.2% and institutions own 29.5%, public float is 51.4%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Insiders hold 19.2% and institutions hold 29.5%. Look for higher insider ownership as a sign that leadership believes in the long-term value of the business.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Mar 2026 | Jones (Rhys) Independent Non-Executive Director | Purchase at price 2.02 per share. | 4K | $8K |
| 16 Mar 2026 | Laing (Melanie) Director (Non-Executive) | Purchase at price 2.02 per share. | 3K | $6K |
| 16 Mar 2026 | McMahon (Michael Peter) Independent Non-Executive Director | Purchase at price 2.02 per share. | 7K | $14K |
| 16 Mar 2026 | Raffe (Julie Elaine) Independent Non-Executive Director | Purchase at price 2.02 per share. | 4K | $9K |
| 19 Sept 2025 | Raffe (Julie Elaine) Independent Non-Executive Director | Other at price 2.03 per share. | 3K | $7K |
Company insiders have been net buyers of shares over the past 12 months. This may indicate management confidence in future prospects.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
Current ratio of 1.35 is below ideal 1.5. Adequate but limited cushion for unexpected expenses.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
1.35x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 1.35x — it has $1.35 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Limited liquidity increases the risk of dividend cuts if cash flow becomes stressed during a downturn. There's less buffer to absorb surprises.
Sources
10.5% average is below the 20% threshold. This suggests the business may lack a durable competitive advantage.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
10.5%
Threshold
20.0%
Worst Year
6.6%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 10.5%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.10 in annual profit. The threshold is 20%, and the worst single year was 6.6%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
Lower ROE means your investment compounds more slowly. At 10.5%, this business needs more capital to generate the same returns as competitors. Consider whether other strengths (yield, stability) compensate for weaker profitability.
Sources
Worst year margin (8.8%) fell below 35% minimum. Volatility suggests weak pricing power or one-time issues.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
9.2%
Threshold
40%
Worst Year
8.8%
Why It Matters
Gross margin indicates how much room a business has to absorb costs and still generate profit.
Formula
(Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue x 100Method
Assess both the long-term average and the weakest year. The framework checks for both level and consistency.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average gross margin is 9.2% — it keeps 9 cents of every revenue dollar after production costs. The threshold is 40%, and the weakest year was 8.8%.
How to Interpret
Sustained high margins usually support durability. Sharp margin swings can signal weaker control or cyclical pressure.
Thin margins leave no cushion for unexpected costs. A small increase in expenses or drop in prices could squeeze profits and threaten the dividend.
Sources
4.6% earnings yield is below the 7.5% threshold. You'd earn nearly as much from safer government bonds, which means the extra risk of owning shares isn't being compensated.
Current Snapshot
Current Yield
4.6%
Required Yield
7.5%
Spread
-2.9pp
Why It Matters
Earnings yield reframes valuation as return on price paid. It helps compare equity earnings power against lower-risk alternatives.
Formula
(Earnings per Share / Stock Price) x 100Method
Calculate current earnings yield, then compare it to the required yield for the stock's industry setting.
Worked Example
With EPS of $0.12 and a share price of $2.64, earnings yield is 4.6%. The required yield for this industry is 7.5% (based on 4.5% government bond rate plus a risk premium).
How to Interpret
A yield above the required level suggests better valuation support; below it indicates thinner compensation for equity risk.
Returns don't justify the added risk compared to safe bonds. Consider whether the dividend yield alone compensates, or wait for a better price.
Sources
How current price compares with estimated intrinsic value
Stock is trading 32% ABOVE the fair-value threshold (includes 25% margin of safety), but still below the estimated intrinsic value.
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
0.8%
Industry Threshold
25%
Status
32% Above Fair Value
Why It Matters
Margin of safety provides a valuation buffer against modelling uncertainty and adverse business outcomes.
Formula
(Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share - Current Price) / Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share x 100Method
Estimate intrinsic value using a two-stage DCF (10-year projection plus terminal value), then compare with current price.
Worked Example
For this stock now: intrinsic value is $2.66 per share, current price is $2.64, and margin of safety is 0.8%.
How to Interpret
Positive margin indicates price below modelled value; negative margin indicates price above modelled value. Compare against the industry's required buffer.
Price remains below the intrinsic value estimate but above your required threshold. Under this methodology, the valuation buffer is thinner, so estimate error and volatility have a larger impact.
Sources
9 positive EPS years meets predictability requirement. Buffett can forecast this business. (systemic event loss year(s) excluded — post-event recovery confirmed)
Current Snapshot
Positive Years
9/10
Allowed Losses
0
EPS CAGR
5.0%
Why It Matters
Consistency in EPS helps distinguish resilient earnings power from one-off performance spikes.
Formula
Positive EPS Years / Available EPS YearsMethod
For 8+ years of data, apply industry-specific loss tolerance. For limited data, every available year must be positive.
Worked Example
This company reported positive earnings in 9 of the last 10 years. The allowed loss tolerance for this industry is 0 years. EPS growth rate (CAGR) is 5.0%.
How to Interpret
Fewer loss years and stronger EPS continuity generally improve confidence in future dividend and valuation assumptions.
Consistent profits mean predictable dividends. You can forecast your income with confidence - this company has proven it can generate earnings reliably.
Sources
Years of earnings needed to retire all long-term debt
Excellent. Could pay off all long-term debt in 0.5 years — minimal debt burden.
Current Snapshot
Payoff Years
0.5yr
Target Years
4yr
Gap
+3.5yr
Why It Matters
Debt payoff years converts leverage into an intuitive time measure, making debt burden easier to compare across stocks.
Formula
Long-Term Debt / Average Net Income (3yr)Method
Use current long-term debt and the 3-year average net income to smooth one-off profit noise.
Worked Example
With $20M in long-term debt and $42M in average annual earnings (3yr), it would take 0.5 years of earnings to pay off all debt. The consumer staples threshold is 4 years.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally indicate stronger debt capacity. Very high values can constrain dividend resilience.
Very low debt means maximum financial flexibility. Interest costs barely dent profits, leaving more for dividends. This company can weather downturns without touching your income.
Sources
Percentage of revenue that becomes profit after all expenses
3.3% net margin meets the 3% threshold but with limited buffer. A small cost increase could push it below.
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
3.3%
Threshold
3.0%
Relative Position
+0.3%
Why It Matters
Net income margin shows how much profit the business keeps from each dollar of revenue after all costs.
Formula
Net Income / Total Revenue x 100Method
Compare current margin with the industry-specific threshold to avoid cross-sector distortions.
Worked Example
This company's net income margin is 3.3% — it keeps 3 cents of every revenue dollar as profit after all expenses. The consumer staples threshold is 3%, putting it 0.3% above the requirement.
How to Interpret
Margins that are both strong and stable can indicate competitive strength; persistent weakness may limit reinvestment and payout capacity.
Margins clear the threshold but are on the lower end. Monitor for consistency — if costs rise or revenue softens, profitability could dip below acceptable levels.
Sources
How efficiently the company turns money into profit
8.3% ROIC is below the 10.5% threshold. Company may not be earning enough to justify the money invested in it.
Current Snapshot
5Y Avg
8.3%
Threshold
10.5%
WACC Delta
-0.2pp
Why It Matters
ROIC measures capital efficiency. Businesses that repeatedly earn above their funding cost can compound value more effectively.
Formula
After-Tax Operating Profit / Invested Capital x 100Method
Use the 5-year average ROIC and compare it with industry WACC plus the required spread in this framework.
Worked Example
This company's 5-year average ROIC is 8.3%, with a cost of capital (WACC) of 8.5%. The -0.2pp gap below WACC suggests it may be destroying value on each dollar invested.
How to Interpret
A healthy spread above WACC suggests value creation; a narrow or negative spread points to weaker capital efficiency.
Returns below the cost of borrowing mean the business destroys value over time. This can erode the foundation that supports dividends — proceed with caution.
Sources
How much earnings are consumed by capital expenditure
CapEx consumes 76% of cumulative earnings — above the 50% threshold. This business requires heavy reinvestment just to maintain operations.
Current Snapshot
10Y CapEx Intensity
76%
Threshold
50%
Buffer
-26%
Why It Matters
CapEx intensity estimates how much of earnings must be reinvested just to sustain operations.
Formula
Cumulative CapEx (10yr) / Cumulative Net Income (10yr) x 100Method
Aggregate 10-year CapEx and net income, then compare the ratio with the sector threshold in the framework.
Worked Example
Over 10 years, 76% of this company's cumulative earnings were consumed by capital expenditure. The consumer staples threshold is 50%, leaving a buffer of -26% (over threshold).
How to Interpret
Lower ratios usually indicate better cash conversion. Higher ratios can reduce room for dividends and buybacks.
High capital intensity means most earnings go back into equipment and infrastructure rather than dividends or growth. Buffett prefers businesses like See's Candies that generate cash without needing much reinvestment.
Sources
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2025Final | 23 Oct 2025 | $0.07 | 100% | $0.05 | $0.02 |
| 3 Apr 2025Interim | 24 Apr 2025 | $0.07 | 100% | $0.05 | $0.02 |
| 7 Oct 2024Final | 24 Oct 2024 | $0.07 | 100% | $0.05 | $0.02 |
| 3 Apr 2024Interim | 24 Apr 2024 | $0.06 | 100% | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| 4 Oct 2023Final | 26 Oct 2023 | $0.06 | 100% | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| 5 Apr 2023Interim | 27 Apr 2023 | $0.06 | 100% | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| 5 Oct 2022Final | 27 Oct 2022 | $0.06 | 100% | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| 7 Apr 2022Interim | 29 Apr 2022 | $0.05 | 100% | $0.03 | $0.01 |
| 7 Oct 2021Final | 29 Oct 2021 | $0.03 | 100% | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| 8 Apr 2020Interim | 30 Apr 2020 | $0.02 | 100% | $0.01 | $0.01 |
Excellent track record. 11 years of consistent dividends through multiple market cycles.
Current Snapshot
History
11yr
Predictability
Variable
Payout Health
Sustainable
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 11 years of dividend history (2016–2026). No suspensions detected — 11 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: Variable. Payout health: Sustainable. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
A 11-year track record through multiple economic cycles gives confidence your income will continue. This company has proven it prioritises shareholder returns.
Sources
Current price ($2.64) is 130% above the ceiling. Wait for a drop to lock in 6% yield.
Current Snapshot
Current Price
$2.64
Max Buy Price
$1.15
Delta
-129.6%
Why It Matters
The price ceiling links valuation discipline to income targets by defining the price that aligns with a 6% yield target.
Formula
6-Year Average Annual Dividend / 0.06Method
Use the 6-year average dividend (not one year) and divide by 0.06 to estimate the maximum entry price for target yield.
Worked Example
With a current price of $2.64 and a ceiling of $1.15, the entry is 129.6% above the ceiling.
How to Interpret
Prices below the ceiling imply a historical yield above 6%; prices above it imply a lower historical yield at entry.
At this price, you won't achieve Barsi's target 6% yield. Consider waiting for a pullback — market volatility often creates more favourable valuations for patient investors.
Sources
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Clover Corporation Limited
Elders Limited
IDP Education Limited
GrainCorp Limited
Metcash Limited
Scroll to see more