Loading page content, please wait.
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited
Financial Services · Asset Management
Updated just now
$2.31
MARKET CAP
$552.10M
P/E RATIO
—
DIV. YIELD
5.2%
FRANKING
98%
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited provides investors with access to a portfolio of long investments and short positions in global listed securities.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
$1.49
For 6% dividend yield
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
1.9% average is below the 12% threshold. This suggests the business may lack a durable competitive advantage. Note: COVID-19 Pandemic year(s) excluded — ROE recovered to 371% of target.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
1.9%
Threshold
12.0%
Worst Year
-26.4%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 1.9%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.02 in annual profit. The threshold is 12%, and the worst single year was -26.4%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
Lower ROE means your investment compounds more slowly. At 1.9%, this business needs more capital to generate the same returns as competitors. Consider whether other strengths (yield, stability) compensate for weaker profitability.
Sources
Real cash left after running the business
Negative free cash flow means the company is consuming cash. May need to raise debt or equity to fund operations.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$-36M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Negative
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $-36M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Negative FCF means the company is consuming more cash than it generates.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Negative cash flow means dividends may require borrowing - an unsustainable situation. The company is spending more cash than it generates, which can't continue indefinitely.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
3.86% yield is well below the 6% target. Not suitable for Barsi's income strategy.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
3.9%
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
5.5%
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
With a 6-year average annual dividend of $0.09 and a share price of $2.31, the Barsi yield is 3.9%. The minimum requirement is 6%. Including franking credits, the gross yield is 5.5%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Low yield means you need significant capital to generate meaningful income. Barsi's strategy focuses on stocks that provide substantial cash flow from day one.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~19 Aug 2026Est | ~25 Sept 2026 | ~$0.07 | 100% | ~$0.05 | $0.02 |
| ~17 Feb 2027Est | ~23 Mar 2027 | ~$0.06 | 100% | ~$0.04 | $0.02 |
Highest price to lock in 6% yield
Industry category of the business
Financial Services is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Asset Management
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Asset Management (Financial Services sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
Sources
Requires both dividend and earnings history to calculate payout ratio.
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited provides investors with access to a portfolio of long investments and short positions in global listed securities. The company was incorporated in 2017 and is based in Sydney, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Leadership holds a small personal stake
Professional fund managers have done their homework and chosen to own this
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Insiders hold 2.3% — some skin in the game, but not a major commitment. Institutions hold 32.5%. Overall a typical ownership structure for a mid-to-large company. Neither a red flag nor a strong positive signal.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
2.3%
Institutional %
32.5%
Float %
65.2%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 2.3% and institutions own 32.5%, public float is 65.2%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Insiders hold 2.3% — some skin in the game, but not a major commitment. Institutions hold 32.5%. Overall a typical ownership structure for a mid-to-large company. Neither a red flag nor a strong positive signal.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Mar 2026 | Whittaker (Noel) Director (Independent) | Acquisition at price 1.61 per share. | 8K | $13K |
| 13 Mar 2026 | Whittaker (Noel) Director (Independent) | Sale at price 1.53 per share. | 46K | $70K |
| 26 Sept 2025 | McDonald (Adelaide) Director (Independent) | Acquisition at price 1.13 per share. | 1K | $1K |
| 26 Sept 2025 | Whittaker (Noel) Director (Independent) | Acquisition at price 1.13 per share. | 10K | $11K |
Company insiders have been net sellers of shares over the past 12 months. Insider selling can occur for many reasons (tax, diversification) and is not necessarily negative.
Value analysis may be affected by missing data.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Feb 2026Interim | 23 Mar 2026 | $0.09 | 100% | $0.06 | $0.03 |
| 28 Aug 2025Final | 25 Sept 2025 | $0.06 | 0% | $0.06 | $0.00 |
| 19 Feb 2025Interim | 19 Mar 2025 | $0.06 | 0% | $0.06 | $0.00 |
| 28 Aug 2024Final | 25 Sept 2024 | $0.05 | 0% | $0.05 | $0.00 |
| 14 Feb 2024Interim | 13 Mar 2024 | $0.05 | 0% | $0.05 | $0.00 |
| 23 Aug 2023Final | 20 Sept 2023 | $0.05 | 0% | $0.05 | $0.00 |
| 23 Feb 2023Interim | 23 Mar 2023 | $0.04 | 0% | $0.04 | $0.00 |
| 25 Aug 2022Final | 22 Sept 2022 | $0.04 | 0% | $0.04 | $0.00 |
| 16 Mar 2022Interim | 13 Apr 2022 | $0.04 | 0% | $0.04 | $0.00 |
| 26 Aug 2021Final | 23 Sept 2021 | $0.06 | 0% | $0.06 | $0.00 |
7 years of consistent dividends meets Barsi's 6-year minimum requirement.
Current Snapshot
History
7yr
Predictability
Moderate
Payout Health
N/A
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 7 years of dividend history (2020–2026). No suspensions detected — 7 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: Moderate. Payout health: N/A. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
A consistent track record through recent years gives confidence your income will continue. This company has shown commitment to shareholder returns.
Sources
Current price ($2.31) is 55% above the ceiling. Wait for a drop to lock in 6% yield.
Current Snapshot
Current Price
$2.31
Max Buy Price
$1.49
Delta
-55.0%
Why It Matters
The price ceiling links valuation discipline to income targets by defining the price that aligns with a 6% yield target.
Formula
6-Year Average Annual Dividend / 0.06Method
Use the 6-year average dividend (not one year) and divide by 0.06 to estimate the maximum entry price for target yield.
Worked Example
With a current price of $2.31 and a ceiling of $1.49, the entry is 55.0% above the ceiling.
How to Interpret
Prices below the ceiling imply a historical yield above 6%; prices above it imply a lower historical yield at entry.
At this price, you won't achieve Barsi's target 6% yield. Consider waiting for a pullback — market volatility often creates more favourable valuations for patient investors.
Sources
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Pacific Current Group Limited
EQT Holdings Limited
MA Financial Group Limited
Generation Development Group Limited
Regal Partners Limited
Scroll to see more