Loading page content, please wait.
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited
N/A
Updated just now
$2.20
MARKET CAP
—
P/E RATIO
—
DIV. YIELD
5.5%
FRANKING
98%
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited provides investors with access to a portfolio of long investments and short positions in global listed securities.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
Profit after production costs, before overhead
Exceptional 100.0% margins indicate strong pricing power and brand value.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
100.0%
Threshold
40%
Worst Year
N/A
Why It Matters
Gross margin indicates how much room a business has to absorb costs and still generate profit.
Formula
(Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue x 100Method
Assess both the long-term average and the weakest year. The framework checks for both level and consistency.
Worked Example
This company's current average gross margin is 100.0% — it keeps 100 cents of every revenue dollar after production costs. The threshold is 40%.
How to Interpret
Sustained high margins usually support durability. Sharp margin swings can signal weaker control or cyclical pressure.
Exceptional margins mean the company has strong pricing power - customers pay premium prices even when cheaper alternatives exist. This buffer protects profits (and dividends) even if costs rise.
Sources
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Current ratio of 1.08 is below ideal 1.5. Adequate but limited cushion for unexpected expenses.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
1.08x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 1.08x — it has $1.08 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Limited liquidity increases the risk of dividend cuts if cash flow becomes stressed during a downturn. There's less buffer to absorb surprises.
Sources
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
1.9% average is below the 20% threshold. This suggests the business may lack a durable competitive advantage. Note: COVID-19 Pandemic year(s) excluded — ROE recovered to 371% of target.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
1.9%
Threshold
20.0%
Worst Year
-26.4%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 1.9%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.02 in annual profit. The threshold is 20%, and the worst single year was -26.4%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
Lower ROE means your investment compounds more slowly. At 1.9%, this business needs more capital to generate the same returns as competitors. Consider whether other strengths (yield, stability) compensate for weaker profitability.
Sources
Real cash left after running the business
Negative free cash flow means the company is consuming cash. May need to raise debt or equity to fund operations.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$-36M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Negative
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $-36M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Negative FCF means the company is consuming more cash than it generates.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Negative cash flow means dividends may require borrowing - an unsustainable situation. The company is spending more cash than it generates, which can't continue indefinitely.
Sources
How efficiently the company turns money into profit
Exceptional 4285.7% ROIC indicates a strong competitive advantage and efficient use of capital.
Current Snapshot
5Y Avg
4285.7%
Threshold
11.0%
WACC Delta
+4276.7pp
Why It Matters
ROIC measures capital efficiency. Businesses that repeatedly earn above their funding cost can compound value more effectively.
Formula
After-Tax Operating Profit / Invested Capital x 100Method
Use the 5-year average ROIC and compare it with industry WACC plus the required spread in this framework.
Worked Example
This company's 5-year average ROIC is 4285.7%, with a cost of capital (WACC) of 9.0%. The +4276.7pp spread above WACC suggests it creates value on each dollar invested.
How to Interpret
A healthy spread above WACC suggests value creation; a narrow or negative spread points to weaker capital efficiency.
Exceptional returns on capital mean every dollar reinvested creates significant value. This is the engine that can power both capital appreciation and growing dividends.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
Insufficient dividend history. Barsi methodology requires 6 years of data to calculate average yield.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
N/A
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
N/A
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
If annual dividends are $0.60 and the share price is $10, dividend yield is 6.0%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Without 6 years of dividend history, we can't assess whether the yield is sustainable or a one-time spike. More data is needed to evaluate income potential.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
Industry category of the business
Unknown is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Unknown
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Unknown. It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
Sources
Requires both dividend and earnings history to calculate payout ratio.
Regal Partners Global Investments Limited provides investors with access to a portfolio of long investments and short positions in global listed securities. The company was incorporated in 2017 and is based in Sydney, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Leadership holds a small personal stake
Professional fund managers have done their homework and chosen to own this
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Insiders hold 2.2% — some skin in the game, but not a major commitment. Institutions hold 33.5%. Overall a typical ownership structure for a mid-to-large company. Neither a red flag nor a strong positive signal.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
2.2%
Institutional %
33.5%
Float %
64.3%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 2.2% and institutions own 33.5%, public float is 64.3%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Insiders hold 2.2% — some skin in the game, but not a major commitment. Institutions hold 33.5%. Overall a typical ownership structure for a mid-to-large company. Neither a red flag nor a strong positive signal.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Mar 2026 | Whittaker (Noel) Director (Independent) | Acquisition at price 1.61 per share. | 8K | $13K |
| 13 Mar 2026 | Whittaker (Noel) Director (Independent) | Sale at price 1.53 per share. | 46K | $70K |
| 26 Sept 2025 | McDonald (Adelaide) Director (Independent) | Acquisition at price 1.13 per share. | 1K | $1K |
| 26 Sept 2025 | Whittaker (Noel) Director (Independent) | Acquisition at price 1.13 per share. | 10K | $11K |
Company insiders have been net sellers of shares over the past 12 months. Insider selling can occur for many reasons (tax, diversification) and is not necessarily negative.
There isn't enough financial data available for Regal Partners Global Investments Limited to calculate value or dividend scores.
•Value: Missing core financial metrics (ROE, debt, margins)
•Dividend: No dividend history available
This is common for small-cap companies, recent listings, or exploration-stage companies.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
Insufficient dividend history for estimation
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Feb 2026Interim | 23 Mar 2026 | $0.09 | 100% | $0.06 | $0.03 |
| 28 Aug 2025Final | 25 Sept 2025 | $0.06 | 0% | $0.06 | $0.00 |
| 19 Feb 2025Interim | 19 Mar 2025 | $0.06 | 0% | $0.06 | $0.00 |
| 28 Aug 2024Final | 25 Sept 2024 | $0.05 | 0% | $0.05 | $0.00 |
| 14 Feb 2024Interim | 13 Mar 2024 | $0.05 | 0% | $0.05 | $0.00 |
| 23 Aug 2023Final | 20 Sept 2023 | $0.05 | 0% | $0.05 | $0.00 |
| 23 Feb 2023Interim | 23 Mar 2023 | $0.04 | 0% | $0.04 | $0.00 |
Only 4 years of dividend history available. Barsi methodology requires 6+ years to evaluate consistency.
Current Snapshot
History
4yr
Predictability
N/A
Payout Health
N/A
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 4 years of dividend history (2023–2026). No suspensions detected — 4 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: N/A. Payout health: N/A. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
Without 6 years of history, we can't verify this company maintained dividends through economic cycles. Longer track records provide confidence your income will continue.
Sources
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Imdex Limited
Tower Limited
Accent Group Limited
Reece Limited
McMillan Shakespeare Limited
Scroll to see more