Loading page content, please wait.
Dyno Nobel Limited
Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals
Updated just now
$3.20
MARKET CAP
$5.64B
P/E RATIO
—
DIV. YIELD
3.7%
FRANKING
34%
Dyno Nobel Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes industrial explosives, chemicals, and fertilizers in the United States and Australia.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
Real cash left after running the business
Positive cash generation. Company produces real cash after capital expenditures - can fund dividends, buybacks, or growth.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$101M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Positive
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $101M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Positive FCF means dividends are funded by real cash generation.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Positive cash flow means dividends are funded by actual money, not accounting profits. As Buffett says, "Cash is fact, profit is opinion." Your income is backed by real cash generation.
Sources
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Current ratio of 1.33 is below ideal 1.5. Adequate but limited cushion for unexpected expenses.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
1.33x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 1.33x — it has $1.33 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Limited liquidity increases the risk of dividend cuts if cash flow becomes stressed during a downturn. There's less buffer to absorb surprises.
Sources
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
5.5% average is below the 15% threshold. This suggests the business may lack a durable competitive advantage. Note: COVID-19 Pandemic year(s) excluded — ROE recovered to 174% of target.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
5.5%
Threshold
15.0%
Worst Year
-6.4%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 5.5%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.05 in annual profit. The threshold is 15%, and the worst single year was -6.4%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
Lower ROE means your investment compounds more slowly. At 5.5%, this business needs more capital to generate the same returns as competitors. Consider whether other strengths (yield, stability) compensate for weaker profitability.
Sources
Price versus estimated intrinsic value and required return thresholds.
What percentage of the stock price comes back as earnings each year
-0.9% earnings yield is below the 7.5% threshold. You'd earn nearly as much from safer government bonds, which means the extra risk of owning shares isn't being compensated.
Current Snapshot
Current Yield
-0.9%
Required Yield
7.5%
Spread
-8.4pp
Why It Matters
Earnings yield reframes valuation as return on price paid. It helps compare equity earnings power against lower-risk alternatives.
Formula
(Earnings per Share / Stock Price) x 100Method
Calculate current earnings yield, then compare it to the required yield for the stock's industry setting.
Worked Example
With EPS of $-0.03 and a share price of $3.20, earnings yield is -0.9%. The required yield for this industry is 7.5% (based on 4.5% government bond rate plus a risk premium).
How to Interpret
A yield above the required level suggests better valuation support; below it indicates thinner compensation for equity risk.
Returns don't justify the added risk compared to safe bonds. Consider whether the dividend yield alone compensates, or wait for a better price.
Sources
Consistency of profits over time
Cyclical business - earnings naturally fluctuate with commodity prices. Focus on dividend consistency instead.
Current Snapshot
Positive Years
8/4
Allowed Losses
0 (limited)
EPS CAGR
21.0%
Why It Matters
Consistency in EPS helps distinguish resilient earnings power from one-off performance spikes.
Formula
Positive EPS Years / Available EPS YearsMethod
For 8+ years of data, apply industry-specific loss tolerance. For limited data, every available year must be positive.
Worked Example
This company reported positive earnings in 8 of the last 4 years, with 2 loss years. With only 4 years of data, every year must be positive. EPS growth rate (CAGR) is 21.0%.
How to Interpret
Fewer loss years and stronger EPS continuity generally improve confidence in future dividend and valuation assumptions.
Cyclical businesses have volatile earnings tied to commodity prices. For these companies, dividend track record is more telling than earnings consistency.
Sources
How much earnings are consumed by capital expenditure
Percentage of revenue that becomes profit after all expenses
Years of earnings needed to retire all long-term debt
Is the business growing — and is debt being managed responsibly?
Revenue declining with stable debt — monitor whether this trend threatens dividend sustainability.
Current Snapshot
Revenue Change
-41.3%
Debt Change
+3.0%
Trend State
Weakening
Why It Matters
Revenue trend shows whether the business is expanding or contracting. Debt trend adds context on whether growth is being funded conservatively.
Formula
Revenue Change (%) = (Latest Revenue - Earliest Revenue) / |Earliest Revenue| x 100; Debt Change (%) = (Latest Debt - Earliest Debt) / |Earliest Debt| x 100Method
Map annual revenue history and, where relevant, annual debt history. For financial companies, debt is excluded because deposits and reserves distort this signal.
Worked Example
Revenue changed by -41.3% across the displayed period, while debt changed by +3.0%.
How to Interpret
Rising revenue with stable or falling debt is typically stronger than rising revenue funded by rapidly rising leverage.
Revenue declining with stable debt — monitor whether this trend threatens dividend sustainability.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
Insufficient dividend history. Barsi methodology requires 6 years of data to calculate average yield.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
N/A
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
N/A
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
If annual dividends are $0.60 and the share price is $10, dividend yield is 6.0%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Without 6 years of dividend history, we can't assess whether the yield is sustainable or a one-time spike. More data is needed to evaluate income potential.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
Industry category of the business
Basic Materials is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Specialty Chemicals
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
Sources
How much of a company's earnings are paid out as dividends
The company is paying out more in dividends than it earns (110%). This is unsustainable long-term and often signals a dividend cut ahead. An inflated payout also distorts the price ceiling calculation used in our analysis.
Current Snapshot
Latest Ratio
110.1%
Healthy Range
30%-75%
Zone
Unsustainable
Why It Matters
Payout ratio links dividends to earnings capacity and helps evaluate whether current distributions are likely to remain supportable.
Formula
Payout Ratio (%) = (Annual Dividend per Share / Earnings per Share) x 100Method
Calculate year-by-year payout ratios where EPS is positive, classify each year by sustainability zone, and compare with the current TTM ratio.
Worked Example
If annual dividend is $1.20 and EPS is $2.00, payout ratio is 60%.
How to Interpret
Ratios in the middle range are usually more sustainable than very high ratios. Values above 100% indicate dividends exceeded earnings in that period.
The company is paying out more in dividends than it earns (110%). This is unsustainable long-term and often signals a dividend cut ahead. An inflated payout also distorts the price ceiling calculation used in our analysis.
Sources
Dyno Nobel Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes industrial explosives, chemicals, and fertilizers in the United States and Australia. It offers packaged explosives, including Powermite, a cartridge explosive; and Dynosplit for pre-split applications, as well as ammonium nitrates. The company also provides initiation systems, such as BlastWeb II, an underground blasting system; CE4 Commander Blasting System and DigiShot Plus.4G, an electronic blasting systems; and electronic detonators, such as DigiShot, DigiShot Plus, DigiShot Plus.4G, and GeoShot for a range of applications, such as surface and underground mining, quarrying, and construction, as well as bulk technologies under TITAN series and software products, such as ViewShot 3D, DIFFERENTIAL ENERGY2, and Nobel Fire. It exports its products.
It also provides Dyno Consult and Drill and Blast Academies services; DYNOBULK FLEX, and Portable Modular Emulsion plants. The company was formerly known as Incitec Pivot Limited and changed its name to Dyno Nobel Limited in March 2025. Dyno Nobel Limited was founded in 1831 and is headquartered in Southbank, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Leadership has very little personal money riding on the stock price
Large fund blocks can amplify price swings unrelated to business quality
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Most shares are held by fund managers (60.5%), while company leadership owns very little (0.1%). This means management’s personal wealth isn’t significantly tied to the stock price. Value investors often prefer companies where leaders have meaningful personal investment — it keeps incentives aligned.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
0.1%
Institutional %
60.5%
Float %
39.5%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 0.1% and institutions own 60.5%, public float is 39.5%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Most shares are held by fund managers (60.5%), while company leadership owns very little (0.1%). This means management’s personal wealth isn’t significantly tied to the stock price. Value investors often prefer companies where leaders have meaningful personal investment — it keeps incentives aligned.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2025 | De Moraes (M Neves) Chief Executive Officer | Purchase at price 2.12 per share. | 31K | $66K |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Brook (Bruce Robert) Independent Non-Executive Director | Other at price 1.76 per share. | 7K | $12K |
| 26 Nov 2025 | De Moraes (M Neves) Chief Executive Officer | Other at price 2.24 per share. | 180K | $403K |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Dwyer (Tonianne) Independent Non-Executive Director | Other at price 1.76 per share. | 7K | $12K |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Robinson (Gregory John) Independent Non-Executive Director | Other at price 1.76 per share. | 28K | $49K |
Company insiders have been net buyers of shares over the past 12 months. This may indicate management confidence in future prospects.
Both value and dividend analyses may be affected by missing data.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
CapEx consumes 147% of cumulative earnings — above the 75% threshold. Expected for this capital-intensive sector.
Current Snapshot
10Y CapEx Intensity
147%
Threshold
75%
Buffer
-72%
Why It Matters
CapEx intensity estimates how much of earnings must be reinvested just to sustain operations.
Formula
Cumulative CapEx (10yr) / Cumulative Net Income (10yr) x 100Method
Aggregate 10-year CapEx and net income, then compare the ratio with the sector threshold in the framework.
Worked Example
Over 10 years, 147% of this company's cumulative earnings were consumed by capital expenditure. The materials & mining threshold is 75%, leaving a buffer of -72% (over threshold).
How to Interpret
Lower ratios usually indicate better cash conversion. Higher ratios can reduce room for dividends and buybacks.
High capital intensity means most earnings go back into maintaining the business rather than rewarding shareholders. This is typical for this sector but limits dividend growth potential.
Sources
-1.4% net margin is below the 15% threshold. May reflect this sector's structural characteristics.
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
-1.4%
Threshold
15.0%
Relative Position
-16.4%
Why It Matters
Net income margin shows how much profit the business keeps from each dollar of revenue after all costs.
Formula
Net Income / Total Revenue x 100Method
Compare current margin with the industry-specific threshold to avoid cross-sector distortions.
Worked Example
This company's net income margin is -1.4% — it keeps -1 cents of every revenue dollar as profit after all expenses. The materials & mining threshold is 15%, putting it 16.4% below the requirement.
How to Interpret
Margins that are both strong and stable can indicate competitive strength; persistent weakness may limit reinvestment and payout capacity.
Lower margins in this sector are common, but they leave less cushion if costs rise or revenue drops. Monitor whether margins are stable over time — consistency matters more than the absolute level.
Sources
Would take 19.0 years of earnings to pay off long-term debt — above the 4-year threshold. Heavy debt relative to earnings.
Current Snapshot
Payoff Years
19.0yr
Target Years
4yr
Gap
-15.0yr
Why It Matters
Debt payoff years converts leverage into an intuitive time measure, making debt burden easier to compare across stocks.
Formula
Long-Term Debt / Average Net Income (3yr)Method
Use current long-term debt and the 3-year average net income to smooth one-off profit noise.
Worked Example
With $1.2B in long-term debt and $65M in average annual earnings (3yr), it would take 19.0 years of earnings to pay off all debt. The materials & mining threshold is 4 years.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally indicate stronger debt capacity. Very high values can constrain dividend resilience.
High debt relative to earnings means interest payments compete with dividends for available cash. If earnings dip, the dividend is at risk because debt must be serviced first.
Sources
Insufficient dividend history for estimation
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2025Interim | 16 Dec 2025 | $0.10 | 0% | $0.10 | $0.00 |
| 13 June 2025Final | 11 July 2025 | $0.02 | 0% | $0.02 | $0.00 |
Only 1 year of dividend history available. Barsi methodology requires 6+ years to evaluate consistency.
Current Snapshot
History
1yr
Predictability
N/A
Payout Health
N/A
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 1 years of dividend history (2025–2025). No suspensions detected — 1 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: N/A. Payout health: N/A. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
Without 6 years of history, we can't verify this company maintained dividends through economic cycles. Longer track records provide confidence your income will continue.
Sources
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Orica Limited
Ramelius Resources Limited
Regis Resources Limited
Perseus Mining Limited
Sims Limited
Scroll to see more