Loading page content, please wait.
Cuscal Limited
Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Updated just now
$5.61
MARKET CAP
$1.12B
P/E RATIO
25.7
DIV. YIELD
2.1%
FRANKING
100%
Cuscal Limited, together with its subsidiaries, provides payment, payments infrastructure, and regulated data related products and services for financial and consumer centric institutions in Australia.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
$9.47
Discounted cash flow estimate
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
Profit after production costs, before overhead
Exceptional 100.0% margins indicate strong pricing power and brand value.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
100.0%
Threshold
40%
Worst Year
100.0%
Why It Matters
Gross margin indicates how much room a business has to absorb costs and still generate profit.
Formula
(Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue x 100Method
Assess both the long-term average and the weakest year. The framework checks for both level and consistency.
Worked Example
This company's 2-year average gross margin is 100.0% — it keeps 100 cents of every revenue dollar after production costs. The threshold is 40%, and the weakest year was 100.0%.
How to Interpret
Sustained high margins usually support durability. Sharp margin swings can signal weaker control or cyclical pressure.
Exceptional margins mean the company has strong pricing power - customers pay premium prices even when cheaper alternatives exist. This buffer protects profits (and dividends) even if costs rise.
Sources
Real cash left after running the business
Positive cash generation. Company produces real cash after capital expenditures - can fund dividends, buybacks, or growth.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$449M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Positive
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $449M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Positive FCF means dividends are funded by real cash generation.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Positive cash flow means dividends are funded by actual money, not accounting profits. As Buffett says, "Cash is fact, profit is opinion." Your income is backed by real cash generation.
Sources
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
How much the company owes vs. what it owns
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Price versus estimated intrinsic value and required return thresholds.
How current price compares with estimated intrinsic value
Consistency of profits over time
Is the business growing — and is debt being managed responsibly?
Current Snapshot
Revenue Change
+21.5%
Debt Change
+70.8%
Trend State
Mixed
Why It Matters
Revenue trend shows whether the business is expanding or contracting. Debt trend adds context on whether growth is being funded conservatively.
Formula
Revenue Change (%) = (Latest Revenue - Earliest Revenue) / |Earliest Revenue| x 100; Debt Change (%) = (Latest Debt - Earliest Debt) / |Earliest Debt| x 100Method
Map annual revenue history and, where relevant, annual debt history. For financial companies, debt is excluded because deposits and reserves distort this signal.
Worked Example
Revenue changed by +21.5% across the displayed period, while debt changed by +70.8%.
How to Interpret
Rising revenue with stable or falling debt is typically stronger than rising revenue funded by rapidly rising leverage.
Review revenue and debt direction together with cash-flow and payout metrics to assess dividend durability.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
Cuscal Limited, together with its subsidiaries, provides payment, payments infrastructure, and regulated data related products and services for financial and consumer centric institutions in Australia. The company provides electronic and paper payment processing solutions, card products, card platform services, digital applications development, liquidity management and settlement services, specialized finance facilities, network communication services, fraud management services, real-time payments, and data services. It also offers real-time payments for banks and PSPs, direct entry, BPAY, Real time settlement, and enablement support and services; card issuing, mobile payments, digital enablement, and card services; consumer data right solutions; fraud monitoring cards and real time payments; merchant solutions for payment facilitators, and ATM solutions. The company was formerly known as Credit Union Services Corporation (Australia) Limited and changed its name to Cuscal Limited in December 2005.
Cuscal Limited was founded in 1977 and is based in Sydney, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Management's wealth moves with yours
A handful of professional investors are watching
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Insiders hold 9.4% and institutions hold 24.5%. Look for higher insider ownership as a sign that leadership believes in the long-term value of the business.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
9.4%
Institutional %
24.5%
Float %
66.0%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 9.4% and institutions own 24.5%, public float is 66.0%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Insiders hold 9.4% and institutions hold 24.5%. Look for higher insider ownership as a sign that leadership believes in the long-term value of the business.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026 | Proust (Elizabeth Mary) Independent Chairman Of The Board | Purchase at price 4.06 per share. | 20K | $81K |
| 13 May 2026 | Cooney (Belinda Jane Cruickshank) Director (Non-Executive) | Other at price 2.90 per share. | 346 | $1K |
| 13 May 2026 | Kennedy (Craig Nicholas) Director (Non-Executive) | Other at price 2.90 per share. | 346 | $1K |
| 13 May 2026 | Ogilvie (Claudine Louise Carol) Director (Non-Executive) | Other at price 2.90 per share. | 250 | $725 |
| 13 May 2026 | Proust (Elizabeth Mary) Independent Chairman Of The Board | Other at price 2.90 per share. | 346 | $1K |
Company insiders have been net buyers of shares over the past 12 months. This may indicate management confidence in future prospects.
Both value and dividend analyses may be affected by missing data.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
9.0% average is below the 12% threshold. This suggests the business may lack a durable competitive advantage.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
9.0%
Threshold
12.0%
Worst Year
7.6%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 9.0%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.09 in annual profit. The threshold is 12%, and the worst single year was 7.6%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
Lower ROE means your investment compounds more slowly. At 9.0%, this business needs more capital to generate the same returns as competitors. Consider whether other strengths (yield, stability) compensate for weaker profitability.
Sources
Debt-to-equity of 9.74 is 19.5x over Buffett's limit. High leverage increases risk during downturns.
Current Snapshot
Current D/E
9.74x
Industry Limit
0.50x
Headroom
-9.24x
Why It Matters
Debt-to-equity shows balance-sheet risk. Lower leverage usually means more flexibility when earnings soften.
Formula
Total Debt / Shareholders' EquityMethod
Compare current D/E against the industry threshold used in the scoring framework, then assess remaining headroom.
Worked Example
This company's D/E is 9.74, meaning it carries 974 cents of debt for every $1 of equity. The technology & software limit is 0.50, leaving it 9.24 over the limit.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally imply lower refinancing pressure and lower dividend stress in downturns.
High debt means interest payments come before dividends. During recessions, heavily indebted companies often cut dividends first to preserve cash. This adds risk to your income stream.
Sources
Current ratio of 0.81 is below 1.0 - company may struggle to pay short-term obligations.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
0.81x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 0.81x — it has $0.81 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Tight liquidity means the company may need to borrow or sell assets to pay bills. Dividends are often the first expense cut when cash runs low.
Sources
Stock is trading 15% BELOW the fair-value threshold (includes 30% margin of safety).
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
40.8%
Industry Threshold
30%
Status
15% Undervalued
Why It Matters
Margin of safety provides a valuation buffer against modelling uncertainty and adverse business outcomes.
Formula
(Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share - Current Price) / Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share x 100Method
Estimate intrinsic value using a two-stage DCF (10-year projection plus terminal value), then compare with current price.
Worked Example
For this stock now: intrinsic value is $9.47 per share, current price is $5.61, and margin of safety is 40.8%.
How to Interpret
Positive margin indicates price below modelled value; negative margin indicates price above modelled value. Compare against the industry's required buffer.
Price is below your required threshold, so you retain a margin-of-safety buffer against normal valuation error and market volatility.
Sources
What percentage of the stock price comes back as earnings each year
3.9% earnings yield is below the 7.5% threshold. You'd earn nearly as much from safer government bonds, which means the extra risk of owning shares isn't being compensated.
Current Snapshot
Current Yield
3.9%
Required Yield
7.5%
Spread
-3.6pp
Why It Matters
Earnings yield reframes valuation as return on price paid. It helps compare equity earnings power against lower-risk alternatives.
Formula
(Earnings per Share / Stock Price) x 100Method
Calculate current earnings yield, then compare it to the required yield for the stock's industry setting.
Worked Example
With EPS of $0.22 and a share price of $5.61, earnings yield is 3.9%. The required yield for this industry is 7.5% (based on 4.5% government bond rate plus a risk premium).
How to Interpret
A yield above the required level suggests better valuation support; below it indicates thinner compensation for equity risk.
Returns don't justify the added risk compared to safe bonds. Consider whether the dividend yield alone compensates, or wait for a better price.
Sources
5/4 positive EPS years. Limited data - full evaluation requires 8+ years. Monitor closely for consistency.
Current Snapshot
Positive Years
5/4
Allowed Losses
0 (limited)
EPS CAGR
15.6%
Why It Matters
Consistency in EPS helps distinguish resilient earnings power from one-off performance spikes.
Formula
Positive EPS Years / Available EPS YearsMethod
For 8+ years of data, apply industry-specific loss tolerance. For limited data, every available year must be positive.
Worked Example
This company reported positive earnings in 5 of the last 4 years. With only 4 years of data, every year must be positive. EPS growth rate (CAGR) is 15.6%.
How to Interpret
Fewer loss years and stronger EPS continuity generally improve confidence in future dividend and valuation assumptions.
So far so good, but limited history means we haven't seen how this company handles a full economic cycle. Monitor closely for continued consistency.
Sources
How efficiently the company turns money into profit
-10.5% ROIC is below the 11.0% threshold. Company may not be earning enough to justify the money invested in it.
Current Snapshot
5Y Avg
-10.5%
Threshold
11.0%
WACC Delta
-19.5pp
Why It Matters
ROIC measures capital efficiency. Businesses that repeatedly earn above their funding cost can compound value more effectively.
Formula
After-Tax Operating Profit / Invested Capital x 100Method
Use the 5-year average ROIC and compare it with industry WACC plus the required spread in this framework.
Worked Example
This company's 5-year average ROIC is -10.5%, with a cost of capital (WACC) of 9.0%. The -19.5pp gap below WACC suggests it may be destroying value on each dollar invested.
How to Interpret
A healthy spread above WACC suggests value creation; a narrow or negative spread points to weaker capital efficiency.
Returns below the cost of borrowing mean the business destroys value over time. This can erode the foundation that supports dividends — proceed with caution.
Sources
How much earnings are consumed by capital expenditure
CapEx consumes 47% of cumulative earnings — above the 25% threshold. This business requires heavy reinvestment just to maintain operations.
Current Snapshot
10Y CapEx Intensity
47%
Threshold
25%
Buffer
-22%
Why It Matters
CapEx intensity estimates how much of earnings must be reinvested just to sustain operations.
Formula
Cumulative CapEx (10yr) / Cumulative Net Income (10yr) x 100Method
Aggregate 10-year CapEx and net income, then compare the ratio with the sector threshold in the framework.
Worked Example
Over 10 years, 47% of this company's cumulative earnings were consumed by capital expenditure. The technology & software threshold is 25%, leaving a buffer of -22% (over threshold).
How to Interpret
Lower ratios usually indicate better cash conversion. Higher ratios can reduce room for dividends and buybacks.
High capital intensity means most earnings go back into equipment and infrastructure rather than dividends or growth. Buffett prefers businesses like See's Candies that generate cash without needing much reinvestment.
Sources
Years of earnings needed to retire all long-term debt
Would take 10.4 years of earnings to pay off long-term debt — above the 3-year threshold. Heavy debt relative to earnings.
Current Snapshot
Payoff Years
10.4yr
Target Years
3yr
Gap
-7.4yr
Why It Matters
Debt payoff years converts leverage into an intuitive time measure, making debt burden easier to compare across stocks.
Formula
Long-Term Debt / Average Net Income (3yr)Method
Use current long-term debt and the 3-year average net income to smooth one-off profit noise.
Worked Example
With $356M in long-term debt and $34M in average annual earnings (3yr), it would take 10.4 years of earnings to pay off all debt. The technology & software threshold is 3 years.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally indicate stronger debt capacity. Very high values can constrain dividend resilience.
High debt relative to earnings means interest payments compete with dividends for available cash. If earnings dip, the dividend is at risk because debt must be serviced first.
Sources
Percentage of revenue that becomes profit after all expenses
10.2% net margin is below the 20% threshold. Thin margins suggest weak competitive position or high costs.
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
10.2%
Threshold
20.0%
Relative Position
-9.8%
Why It Matters
Net income margin shows how much profit the business keeps from each dollar of revenue after all costs.
Formula
Net Income / Total Revenue x 100Method
Compare current margin with the industry-specific threshold to avoid cross-sector distortions.
Worked Example
This company's net income margin is 10.2% — it keeps 10 cents of every revenue dollar as profit after all expenses. The technology & software threshold is 20%, putting it 9.8% below the requirement.
How to Interpret
Margins that are both strong and stable can indicate competitive strength; persistent weakness may limit reinvestment and payout capacity.
Thin margins mean a small increase in costs or drop in prices could eliminate profits entirely. This puts dividends at risk because there's no buffer to absorb shocks.
Sources
Insufficient dividend history. Barsi methodology requires 6 years of data to calculate average yield.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
N/A
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
N/A
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
If annual dividends are $0.60 and the share price is $10, dividend yield is 6.0%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Without 6 years of dividend history, we can't assess whether the yield is sustainable or a one-time spike. More data is needed to evaluate income potential.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026Final | 18 Sept 2026 | $0.10 | 100% | $0.07 | $0.03 |
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Mar 2026Interim | 31 Mar 2026 | $0.04 | 0% | $0.04 | $0.00 |
| 28 Aug 2025Final | 25 Sept 2025 | $0.06 | 0% | $0.06 | $0.00 |
Only 2 years of dividend history available. Barsi methodology requires 6+ years to evaluate consistency.
Current Snapshot
History
2yr
Predictability
N/A
Payout Health
N/A
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 2 years of dividend history (2025–2026). No suspensions detected — 2 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: N/A. Payout health: N/A. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
Without 6 years of history, we can't verify this company maintained dividends through economic cycles. Longer track records provide confidence your income will continue.
Sources
Industry category of the business
Technology is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Software - Infrastructure
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Sources
How much of a company's earnings are paid out as dividends
A 46% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Current Snapshot
Latest Ratio
45.9%
Healthy Range
30%-75%
Zone
Healthy
Why It Matters
Payout ratio links dividends to earnings capacity and helps evaluate whether current distributions are likely to remain supportable.
Formula
Payout Ratio (%) = (Annual Dividend per Share / Earnings per Share) x 100Method
Calculate year-by-year payout ratios where EPS is positive, classify each year by sustainability zone, and compare with the current TTM ratio.
Worked Example
$0.12 dividend / $0.22 EPS equals 52.8% payout ratio.
How to Interpret
Ratios in the middle range are usually more sustainable than very high ratios. Values above 100% indicate dividends exceeded earnings in that period.
A 46% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Sources
Data#3 Limited
Iress Limited
Bravura Solutions Limited
Hansen Technologies Limited
Dicker Data Limited
Scroll to see more