Loading page content, please wait.
Austin Engineering Limited
Industrials · Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Updated just now
$0.17
MARKET CAP
$102.70M
P/E RATIO
3.9
DIV. YIELD
7.1%
FRANKING
100%
Austin Engineering Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, repairs, overhauls, and supplies mining attachment products, and other related products and services for the industrial and resources-related business sectors.
View full descriptionThe Warsi Rating combines two proven approaches: value investing principles and dividend strategy. A stock must score 70+ on both to be rated Solid or higher.
$1.57
Discounted cash flow estimate
$0.13
For 6% dividend yield
Business quality and balance-sheet durability.
How much the company owes vs. what it owns
Acceptable. Debt level (0.36) is within this Buffett-inspired framework's limit of 1.
Current Snapshot
Current D/E
0.36x
Industry Limit
1.00x
Headroom
+0.64x
Why It Matters
Debt-to-equity shows balance-sheet risk. Lower leverage usually means more flexibility when earnings soften.
Formula
Total Debt / Shareholders' EquityMethod
Compare current D/E against the industry threshold used in the scoring framework, then assess remaining headroom.
Worked Example
This company's D/E is 0.36, meaning it carries 36 cents of debt for every $1 of equity. The industrials & services limit is 1.00, leaving 0.64 of headroom.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally imply lower refinancing pressure and lower dividend stress in downturns.
Low debt means this company isn't at risk of cutting dividends to service loans during downturns. Your income stream is protected by a strong balance sheet.
Sources
Profit after production costs, before overhead
Exceptional 65.2% margins indicate strong pricing power and brand value.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
65.2%
Threshold
40%
Worst Year
60.8%
Why It Matters
Gross margin indicates how much room a business has to absorb costs and still generate profit.
Formula
(Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold) / Revenue x 100Method
Assess both the long-term average and the weakest year. The framework checks for both level and consistency.
Worked Example
This company's 4-year average gross margin is 65.2% — it keeps 65 cents of every revenue dollar after production costs. The threshold is 40%, and the weakest year was 60.8%.
How to Interpret
Sustained high margins usually support durability. Sharp margin swings can signal weaker control or cyclical pressure.
Exceptional margins mean the company has strong pricing power - customers pay premium prices even when cheaper alternatives exist. This buffer protects profits (and dividends) even if costs rise.
Sources
Short-term assets vs. short-term debts
Adequate liquidity. 1.55 ratio meets Buffett's 1.5 target.
Current Snapshot
Current Ratio
1.55x
Warning Floor
1.00x
Target
1.50x
Why It Matters
Liquidity supports operational stability. Companies with weak liquidity can face pressure even when long-term fundamentals are sound.
Formula
Current Assets / Current LiabilitiesMethod
Compare the current ratio to the warning floor and target level used in the framework.
Worked Example
This company's current ratio is 1.55x — it has $1.55 in short-term assets for every $1 of short-term liabilities. The target is 1.5x, with a warning floor at 1.0x.
How to Interpret
Ratios above the target suggest healthier short-term resilience; ratios below 1.0x can indicate immediate funding risk.
Ample cash reserves mean the company can pay dividends even during temporary revenue drops. Your income has a buffer against short-term disruptions.
Sources
Profit generated per $1 of shareholder investment
6.2% average is below the 15% threshold. This suggests the business may lack a durable competitive advantage.
Current Snapshot
10Y Avg
6.2%
Threshold
15.0%
Worst Year
-15.3%
Why It Matters
ROE shows how effectively management turns shareholder capital into profit. High and stable ROE can signal pricing power, cost discipline, or both.
Formula
Net Income / Shareholders' Equity x 100Method
Use the 10-year average ROE and review the weakest year to check whether returns stayed resilient across cycles.
Worked Example
This company's 10-year average ROE is 6.2%, meaning each $1 of shareholder equity generates $0.06 in annual profit. The threshold is 15%, and the worst single year was -15.3%.
How to Interpret
Higher and steadier ROE generally supports stronger long-term compounding. Large drawdowns in weak years can point to fragility.
Lower ROE means your investment compounds more slowly. At 6.2%, this business needs more capital to generate the same returns as competitors. Consider whether other strengths (yield, stability) compensate for weaker profitability.
Sources
Real cash left after running the business
Negative free cash flow means the company is consuming cash. May need to raise debt or equity to fund operations.
Current Snapshot
Current FCF
$-7M
Pass Rule
> $0
Status
Negative
Why It Matters
Free cash flow is the cash available after core operating and capital needs. It is central to dividend capacity.
Formula
Operating Cash Flow - Capital ExpendituresMethod
Review whether free cash flow is consistently positive and whether it is sufficient relative to dividends and debt needs.
Worked Example
This company generated $-7M in free cash flow — cash left after operating costs and capital expenditure. Negative FCF means the company is consuming more cash than it generates.
How to Interpret
Persistently negative free cash flow can force reliance on borrowing or equity issuance to maintain payouts.
Negative cash flow means dividends may require borrowing - an unsustainable situation. The company is spending more cash than it generates, which can't continue indefinitely.
Sources
Price versus estimated intrinsic value and required return thresholds.
What percentage of the stock price comes back as earnings each year
Strong value. 25.7% earnings yield exceeds the threshold, and multiple valuation checks confirm it's attractively priced.
Current Snapshot
Current Yield
25.7%
Required Yield
7.5%
Spread
+18.2pp
Why It Matters
Earnings yield reframes valuation as return on price paid. It helps compare equity earnings power against lower-risk alternatives.
Formula
(Earnings per Share / Stock Price) x 100Method
Calculate current earnings yield, then compare it to the required yield for the stock's industry setting.
Worked Example
With EPS of $0.04 and a share price of $0.17, earnings yield is 25.7%. The required yield for this industry is 7.5% (based on 4.5% government bond rate plus a risk premium).
How to Interpret
A yield above the required level suggests better valuation support; below it indicates thinner compensation for equity risk.
Multiple ways of measuring value agree: you're getting a fair deal. The stock offers solid returns compared to what you'd earn from safe bonds.
Sources
How current price compares with estimated intrinsic value
Years of earnings needed to retire all long-term debt
Excellent. Could pay off all long-term debt in 0.9 years — minimal debt burden.
Current Snapshot
Payoff Years
0.9yr
Target Years
5yr
Gap
+4.1yr
Why It Matters
Debt payoff years converts leverage into an intuitive time measure, making debt burden easier to compare across stocks.
Formula
Long-Term Debt / Average Net Income (3yr)Method
Use current long-term debt and the 3-year average net income to smooth one-off profit noise.
Worked Example
With $16M in long-term debt and $18M in average annual earnings (3yr), it would take 0.9 years of earnings to pay off all debt. The industrials & services threshold is 5 years.
How to Interpret
Lower values generally indicate stronger debt capacity. Very high values can constrain dividend resilience.
Very low debt means maximum financial flexibility. Interest costs barely dent profits, leaving more for dividends. This company can weather downturns without touching your income.
Sources
How efficiently the company turns money into profit
How much earnings are consumed by capital expenditure
Percentage of revenue that becomes profit after all expenses
Consistency of profits over time
Is the business growing — and is debt being managed responsibly?
Revenue and debt both growing — check whether debt is funding productive growth or covering shortfalls. Sustainable dividends require revenue to outpace debt over time.
Current Snapshot
Revenue Change
+86.7%
Debt Change
+1235.3%
Trend State
Mixed
Why It Matters
Revenue trend shows whether the business is expanding or contracting. Debt trend adds context on whether growth is being funded conservatively.
Formula
Revenue Change (%) = (Latest Revenue - Earliest Revenue) / |Earliest Revenue| x 100; Debt Change (%) = (Latest Debt - Earliest Debt) / |Earliest Debt| x 100Method
Map annual revenue history and, where relevant, annual debt history. For financial companies, debt is excluded because deposits and reserves distort this signal.
Worked Example
Revenue changed by +86.7% across the displayed period, while debt changed by +1235.3%.
How to Interpret
Rising revenue with stable or falling debt is typically stronger than rising revenue funded by rapidly rising leverage.
Revenue and debt both growing — check whether debt is funding productive growth or covering shortfalls. Sustainable dividends require revenue to outpace debt over time.
Sources
Annual dividends as percentage of stock price
4.55% yield is well below the 6% target. Not suitable for Barsi's income strategy.
Current Snapshot
6Y Avg Yield
4.5%
6% Requirement
6.0%
Gross Yield
6.5%
Why It Matters
Yield translates dividend income into a percentage of the price paid, which is central to income-first screening.
Formula
Annual Dividends per Share / Stock Price x 100Method
Use the 6-year average annual dividend for consistency and compare the result with the 6% framework requirement.
Worked Example
With a 6-year average annual dividend of $0.01 and a share price of $0.17, the Barsi yield is 4.5%. The minimum requirement is 6%. Including franking credits, the gross yield is 6.5%.
How to Interpret
Higher sustainable yield improves upfront income, but unusually high yields may reflect elevated risk or weak coverage.
Low yield means you need significant capital to generate meaningful income. Barsi's strategy focuses on stocks that provide substantial cash flow from day one.
Sources
Track record of consistent dividend payments
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Mar 2026Interim | 10 Apr 2026 | $0.00 | 100% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| ~26 Nov 2026Est | ~24 Dec 2026 | ~$0.00 | 0% | ~$0.00 | $0.00 |
Highest price to lock in 6% yield
Industry category of the business
Industrials is not a BESST sector. Non-BESST stocks receive a lower base score but can still qualify with exceptional dividend metrics.
Current Snapshot
Industry
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
BESST Match
No
Score Impact
No bonus
Why It Matters
Sector classification helps contextualise risk and demand durability, which can materially affect dividend stability.
Formula
BESST Match = Sector in {Banks, Energy, Sanitation, Insurance, Telecom}Method
Match company sector or industry against BESST categories. A match adds scoring support but does not replace core dividend checks.
Worked Example
This company operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials sector). It does not match a BESST sector, so it receives the standard base score. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong dividend metrics.
How to Interpret
Sources
How much of a company's earnings are paid out as dividends
A 52% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Current Snapshot
Latest Ratio
52.5%
Healthy Range
30%-75%
Zone
Healthy
Why It Matters
Payout ratio links dividends to earnings capacity and helps evaluate whether current distributions are likely to remain supportable.
Formula
Payout Ratio (%) = (Annual Dividend per Share / Earnings per Share) x 100Method
Calculate year-by-year payout ratios where EPS is positive, classify each year by sustainability zone, and compare with the current TTM ratio.
Worked Example
$0.01 dividend / $0.04 EPS equals 35.4% payout ratio.
How to Interpret
Ratios in the middle range are usually more sustainable than very high ratios. Values above 100% indicate dividends exceeded earnings in that period.
A 52% payout is in the sustainable range (30–75%) — the company balances rewarding shareholders with reinvesting for growth. This gives the price ceiling calculation a stable base, which is a healthy sign for long-term dividend investors.
Sources
Austin Engineering Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, repairs, overhauls, and supplies mining attachment products, and other related products and services for the industrial and resources-related business sectors. The company offers buckets, such as back hoe, wheel loader, hydraulic loading shovels, rope shovel dipper, and underground LHD; and dump bodies, underground dump bodies, tyre handlers, ancillary products, and water tanks. It also provides on and off site repair and maintenance services, including specialized site machining, specialized fabrication and welding, specialized machining, on-site machining of ball and crusher mill tyre, metal spraying, NDT testing, service and exchange parts, and heavy equipment reclamation services, as well as manufacturing and supply of pins and bushes. It operates in Australia, Chile, the United States, Canada, Indonesia, and internationally.
The company was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Kewdale, Australia.
Who owns the company's shares and how much leadership has at stake
Management's wealth moves with yours
A handful of professional investors are watching
Shares freely traded on the ASX by individual investors like you
Insiders hold 11.3% and institutions hold 27.9%. Look for higher insider ownership as a sign that leadership believes in the long-term value of the business.
Current Snapshot
Insider %
11.3%
Institutional %
27.9%
Float %
60.7%
Why It Matters
Ownership mix affects governance incentives, liquidity, and share-price behaviour under large portfolio rebalancing flows.
Formula
Public Float (%) = 100 - Insider Ownership (%) - Institutional Ownership (%)Method
Use reported ownership percentages, convert to percentage terms, and compute remaining public float as the residual.
Worked Example
If insiders own 11.3% and institutions own 27.9%, public float is 60.7%.
How to Interpret
Higher insider ownership can improve alignment of incentives, while dominant institutional concentration can amplify short-term price moves.
Insiders hold 11.3% and institutions hold 27.9%. Look for higher insider ownership as a sign that leadership believes in the long-term value of the business.
Sources
| Date | Insider | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2026 | Stone (Ian) Director (Non-Executive) | Purchase at price 0.15 per share. | 73K | $11K |
| 27 Feb 2026 | Van Dyk (Sybrandt) Independent Non-Executive Director | Purchase at price 0.14 per share. | 520K | $72K |
| 27 Feb 2026 | Walker (James Allan) Independent Non-Executive Chairman | Purchase at price 0.14 per share. | 125K | $18K |
| 28 Nov 2025 | Walker (James Allan) Independent Non-Executive Chairman | Purchase at price 0.13 per share. | 100K | $13K |
| 30 June 2025 | D'Rozario (Vincent) Chief Operating Officer | Unknown | 12K | — |
Company insiders have been net buyers of shares over the past 12 months. This may indicate management confidence in future prospects.
Value analysis may be affected by missing data.
Market data sourced from third-party financial data providers. Analysis generated using Warsi Criteria — proprietary scoring algorithms for value investing and dividend income analysis. Not financial advice. Learn how we analyse stocks →
Exceptional discount: 85% BELOW the fair-value threshold (includes 30% margin of safety).
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
89.2%
Industry Threshold
30%
Status
85% Undervalued
Why It Matters
Margin of safety provides a valuation buffer against modelling uncertainty and adverse business outcomes.
Formula
(Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share - Current Price) / Estimated Intrinsic Value per Share x 100Method
Estimate intrinsic value using a two-stage DCF (10-year projection plus terminal value), then compare with current price.
Worked Example
For this stock now: intrinsic value is $1.57 per share, current price is $0.17, and margin of safety is 89.2%.
How to Interpret
Positive margin indicates price below modelled value; negative margin indicates price above modelled value. Compare against the industry's required buffer.
The market price sits far below your required entry threshold, providing a substantial valuation buffer if assumptions prove optimistic.
Sources
13.6% ROIC clears the 11.0% threshold, but the spread over the 9.0% cost of capital is narrow. A small decline could eliminate the value-creation margin.
Current Snapshot
5Y Avg
13.6%
Threshold
11.0%
WACC Delta
+4.6pp
Why It Matters
ROIC measures capital efficiency. Businesses that repeatedly earn above their funding cost can compound value more effectively.
Formula
After-Tax Operating Profit / Invested Capital x 100Method
Use the 5-year average ROIC and compare it with industry WACC plus the required spread in this framework.
Worked Example
This company's 5-year average ROIC is 13.6%, with a cost of capital (WACC) of 9.0%. The +4.6pp spread above WACC suggests it creates value on each dollar invested.
How to Interpret
A healthy spread above WACC suggests value creation; a narrow or negative spread points to weaker capital efficiency.
Returns exceed capital costs but the margin is thin. Monitor for consistency — if ROIC dips or borrowing costs rise, this company could shift from value creator to value destroyer.
Sources
CapEx consumes 42% of cumulative earnings — within the 50% threshold but approaching the limit.
Current Snapshot
10Y CapEx Intensity
42%
Threshold
50%
Buffer
+8%
Why It Matters
CapEx intensity estimates how much of earnings must be reinvested just to sustain operations.
Formula
Cumulative CapEx (10yr) / Cumulative Net Income (10yr) x 100Method
Aggregate 10-year CapEx and net income, then compare the ratio with the sector threshold in the framework.
Worked Example
Over 10 years, 42% of this company's cumulative earnings were consumed by capital expenditure. The industrials & services threshold is 50%, leaving a buffer of +8%.
How to Interpret
Lower ratios usually indicate better cash conversion. Higher ratios can reduce room for dividends and buybacks.
Capital needs are within acceptable bounds but on the higher end. If CapEx requirements increase, there may be less room for dividends and growth.
Sources
6.9% net margin is below the 8% threshold. May reflect this sector's structural characteristics.
Current Snapshot
Current Margin
6.9%
Threshold
8.0%
Relative Position
-1.1%
Why It Matters
Net income margin shows how much profit the business keeps from each dollar of revenue after all costs.
Formula
Net Income / Total Revenue x 100Method
Compare current margin with the industry-specific threshold to avoid cross-sector distortions.
Worked Example
This company's net income margin is 6.9% — it keeps 7 cents of every revenue dollar as profit after all expenses. The industrials & services threshold is 8%, putting it 1.1% below the requirement.
How to Interpret
Margins that are both strong and stable can indicate competitive strength; persistent weakness may limit reinvestment and payout capacity.
Lower margins in this sector are common, but they leave less cushion if costs rise or revenue drops. Monitor whether margins are stable over time — consistency matters more than the absolute level.
Sources
4 loss year(s) found with only 4 years of data. Limited data requires 100% positive EPS - industry exemptions don't apply.
Current Snapshot
Positive Years
5/4
Allowed Losses
0 (limited)
EPS CAGR
47.4%
Why It Matters
Consistency in EPS helps distinguish resilient earnings power from one-off performance spikes.
Formula
Positive EPS Years / Available EPS YearsMethod
For 8+ years of data, apply industry-specific loss tolerance. For limited data, every available year must be positive.
Worked Example
This company reported positive earnings in 5 of the last 4 years, with 4 loss years. With only 4 years of data, every year must be positive. EPS growth rate (CAGR) is 47.4%.
How to Interpret
Fewer loss years and stronger EPS continuity generally improve confidence in future dividend and valuation assumptions.
Loss years signal unpredictable earnings. During loss periods, companies often cut dividends to preserve cash. Your income could be at risk in the next downturn.
Sources
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Gross | Franking | Net | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2025Final | 9 Oct 2025 | $0.01 | 0% | $0.01 | $0.00 |
| 17 Mar 2025Interim | 14 Apr 2025 | $0.01 | 0% | $0.01 | $0.00 |
| 12 Sept 2024Final | 10 Oct 2024 | $0.01 | 0% | $0.01 | $0.00 |
| 14 Mar 2024Interim | 11 Apr 2024 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 6 Oct 2022Final | 3 Nov 2022 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 14 Mar 2022Interim | 11 Apr 2022 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 9 Sept 2021Final | 7 Oct 2021 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 15 Mar 2021Interim | 12 Apr 2021 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 10 Sept 2020Final | 8 Oct 2020 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 4 Mar 2020Interim | 1 Apr 2020 | $0.00 | 0% | $0.00 | $0.00 |
6 years of consistent dividends meets Barsi's 6-year minimum requirement.
Current Snapshot
History
6yr
Predictability
Variable
Payout Health
Sustainable
Why It Matters
Payment consistency is a direct test of dividend reliability. Large cuts or skips often appear before confidence recovers.
Formula
Consecutive Years = count of years with dividend payments and no disqualifying skip/cut eventsMethod
Require at least 6 years of history, then check for skipped years and large cuts, allowing approved systemic-event exceptions.
Worked Example
This company has 6 years of dividend history (2020–2026). No suspensions detected — 6 consecutive years of payments. Predictability: Variable. Payout health: Sustainable. The minimum requirement is 6 years.
How to Interpret
Longer uninterrupted records generally signal stronger income reliability than high yield alone.
A consistent track record through recent years gives confidence your income will continue. This company has shown commitment to shareholder returns.
Sources
Current price ($0.17) is 31% above the ceiling. Wait for a drop to lock in 6% yield.
Current Snapshot
Current Price
$0.17
Max Buy Price
$0.13
Delta
-26.9%
Why It Matters
The price ceiling links valuation discipline to income targets by defining the price that aligns with a 6% yield target.
Formula
6-Year Average Annual Dividend / 0.06Method
Use the 6-year average dividend (not one year) and divide by 0.06 to estimate the maximum entry price for target yield.
Worked Example
With a current price of $0.17 and a ceiling of $0.13, the entry is 26.9% above the ceiling.
How to Interpret
Prices below the ceiling imply a historical yield above 6%; prices above it imply a lower historical yield at entry.
At this price, you won't achieve Barsi's target 6% yield. Consider waiting for a pullback — market volatility often creates more favourable valuations for patient investors.
Sources
BESST alignment is a positive context signal. Non-BESST stocks can still qualify with strong yield and dividend consistency.
Non-essential businesses face demand drops during recessions — discretionary spending is first to be cut. This increases cyclical risk for dividends, but companies with decades of consistent payments can still demonstrate durability.
Imdex Limited
Count Limited
PRL Global Ltd.
Fleetwood Limited
Korvest Ltd
Scroll to see more